Reonomy Alternatives for Contractors (2026): 7 Options Compared

Three annual research seats for a roofing sales team start with a $14,400 budget: Reonomy’s published starting rate of $400 per user per month x three users x twelve months, before additional-license discounts. Start with the rep’s assignment. I would first decide whether each rep needs a research seat or whether one list of 300 fitting buildings will keep the team busy.

Ground Control by PorchRocket supplies those buildings for $3,000 to $6,000, before optional contact research, with the area and physical features selected to fit your work so the team can start from the delivered file. A warehouse with the right membrane roof or a retail center with several rooftop units gives the rep a reason to start the conversation.

Reonomy also offers monthly access, and one researcher may cover your team’s needs. The comparison below accounts for that. I would decide on the cost of a fitting building delivered to the rep, including the office hours spent rejecting the wrong properties.

How we compared Reonomy alternatives for contractors

I rank Ground Control first because a trade company buying 300 prospects needs building selection done before its reps start calling.

This comparison uses current vendor documentation and published prices, followed by a worked budget. The criteria are the work a sales manager must get done:

• Select the physical fit. Start with building size and business type, then the roof age band, material or visible equipment that matters to your service.
• Buy an appropriate quantity. Compare a per-building order with the subscription term and number of research users you need.
• Put a price on screening. Count the time to reject a property, including a site visit that should never have happened.
• Identify the buying role. Price owner information and decision-maker research separately where they are add-ons.
• Get a usable file on a known date. Ground Control supplies CSV and Excel within 48 hours after payment, with no annual software commitment.
• Define what happens to a wrong match. Ground Control credits a wrong property reported within 30 days and includes why each building matched.

An HVAC department can start with five or more visible rooftop units. A paving crew needs a paved parking area on the property types it services. A tank service company begins with visible storage tanks. None of those buying decisions starts with the building’s last sale price.

I would give every vendor the same written request and ask for a sample file that shows the fields used to select each building, along with the information the rep will receive after purchase. Inspect the rows yourself. Ask which fields still require a person to check the building.

The broader commercial property data provider comparison covers the categories. Here, the deciding question is narrower: how much work remains between purchasing access and assigning a building to a rep?

Reonomy alternatives at a glance

Ground Control leads this comparison for trade prospecting; the other options serve ownership research, transaction analysis or the operation of a property database.

Prices below were checked in November 2026. Annual totals are arithmetic from published rates, and optional purchases sit outside the stated base prices.

Product	Published buying basis	Best fit in this comparison	Work to settle before ordering
Ground Control	$10 to $20 per commercial building	Buildings selected for a trade’s physical requirements	Choose criteria and any contact research add-ons
Reonomy, the baseline	From $400 monthly on an annual plan; from $500 month to month	Ownership and transaction research	Confirm export package and the physical filters required
CoStar	Quote-based through sales	Sales, leasing and market research	Obtain a user and territory quote; test trade screening
PropertyRadar	Solo $119 monthly; three-user Team $2,388 prepaid annually	Property records and ongoing outreach	Establish how visible building features will be checked
Regrid	Pro $10 monthly or $100 annually; Team $20 per user monthly	Parcel mapping and field research	Assign screening and contact research
ATTOM	Basic Property API from $500 monthly; Premium quoted	Data for an internal application or analysis team	Confirm licensed fields and budget implementation
LightBox Vision	Quote-based	Map-based site and ownership research	Specify the product, area and output required
Crexi Intelligence	Select $3,228 annually; export-capable Standard quoted	Investment and property research	Price Standard for a campaign requiring property-data exports

The sections below link each vendor’s supporting pages. A low software price can be the right answer when someone in your office can quickly produce the required list, while Ground Control earns its place when building selection is the work you want to purchase.

Reonomy’s strengths and the trade work left over

Reonomy documents owner and entity research alongside sales and debt records, making it an option when finding ownership relationships is the main job.

The platform remains an Altus Group business. Its data guide describes connections between properties and people, with contact confidence grades. A researcher can narrow a territory before investigating individual properties by using physical fields such as building area and lot size, along with the recorded years of construction and renovation.

The same guide lists annual-plan access from $400 per month, or $400 x 12 = $4,800 over a year, and monthly access from $500. The current subscription page includes 1,000 monthly exports with annual access, offers additional annual-license discounts, and makes export packs an extra purchase for monthly users. Price the arrangement your team needs. One researcher may be enough to build the territory for all three reps.

For a trade campaign, the gap is the physical screening still to be done. The published field list does not establish a roof-age band or a search for five visible rooftop units. That is a reason to request those exact fields before buying.

A construction year cannot tell your estimator when a particular roof section was replaced. For the first roofing list, I would ask for the roof age basis and material category, then select a size band the crew can handle. For HVAC, I would require a building-level equipment criterion before assigning an account.

When you leave Reonomy, you give up access to its ownership and transaction research under your subscription, while Ground Control replaces the task of sourcing fitting buildings for the reps who will work them. Keep the research subscription if those other records earn their cost.

Pick it if ownership relationships and transaction history are recurring research tasks your team will use between prospecting campaigns.

1. Ground Control for trade companies

For a contractor selecting roofs or equipment to service, Ground Control delivers matched commercial buildings for $10 to $20 each without an annual license.

The commercial building search starts with your service area and business types. A roofing team can combine a 10-plus-year roof age band with membrane roofs and buildings of 25,000 or 50,000 square feet or more, while an HVAC team can select two or more, or five or more, visible rooftop units.

Other trades can select paved parking areas, storage tanks, loading docks or industrial yards. Landscaping crews can choose properties with lawns and planting beds. The product’s job is to identify buildings that fit the work, across the trades that sell to property owners.

Every row says why the property matched. Put that reason in the rep’s notes. Build the first campaign around commercial roof criteria or rooftop HVAC buildings, then write an offer that fits those properties.

Orders start at ten buildings. Delivery is within 48 hours after payment, often sooner, and the aerial imagery is never older than two years when the order runs. Ground Control sends properties it is at least 90% sure match and credits wrong matches reported within 30 days.

Owner information and decision-maker contact research are separate add-ons. Named contacts can include role, email, phone and LinkedIn where found; we never charge for a contact we do not find. CSV and Excel delivery let you work in the tools you already use, with import layouts for SalesRabbit and SPOTIO and help mapping CRM fields.

I would buy one tightly defined territory first. A coating crew should specify its material and size requirements before adding every older roof in the county. An HVAC sales manager should decide how far the service department can travel for a PM agreement before widening the area.

Pick it if your team wants the fitting buildings delivered and would rather spend its next research block talking to prospects.

2. CoStar for sales and lease research

CoStar fits a business that regularly studies commercial transactions and leasing markets, with subscription pricing obtained from its sales team.

Its product overview describes sale comparables, lease activity and market analytics, alongside property and tenant information. The stated users include brokers, investors and occupiers. Its sales contact page supplies the route to a quote rather than a public dollar schedule.

For a trade company, I would first separate the work the office does from the work it might someday do. A rep selling roof maintenance needs the right building and a path to the person handling that budget. Regular research into local lease activity earns its cost only if someone uses it to make decisions.

Ask for the territory export. A property profile shown during a sales call can hold information that is not available as a territory-wide search or as a column in your file, so have the vendor identify what reaches the rep. Ask before comparing prices.

Put the quoted term and user count beside the hours required to finish the list, rather than substituting an online anecdote about someone else’s subscription for the total your own office will pay. A team running a brokerage and a service business may need both research and matched-building orders. Price the roofing job first.

The CoStar alternatives comparison goes further into that choice. Pick it if leasing and transaction analysis are part of your weekly work, alongside prospecting.

3. PropertyRadar for records and outreach

PropertyRadar combines property records with marketing tools, with Solo access priced at $119 monthly and a Team plan that includes three users.

The published plan table puts Team at $2,388 prepaid annually, calculated from its annual rate, or $2,988 across twelve monthly payments. Solo includes 10,000 monthly exports and an allowance listed as 250 monthly phones and emails. That export allowance covers the model’s 1,200 candidate records; budget additional contact purchases if your campaign needs more than the included contact allowance.

PropertyRadar’s description of its business includes contractors and home-service companies. Its approach is to make public property and owner records searchable and support outreach from the resulting lists.

The question for a commercial service department is what separates a likely building from a fitting one. Have someone show the exact query for your equipment or roof requirement. A list selected on recorded age or owner characteristics still needs a decision about the physical feature you service.

Time the first fifty records. Keep the accepted and rejected buildings in separate columns, with the minutes spent reaching each decision beside them, so you can compare the workload with a Ground Control file selected to the same criteria. Give the lower software bill its credit. Count the screening hours too.

If the main job is repeated mail or phone outreach around record-based criteria, the platform can fit, but price the screening labor before renewing if staff spend the day examining buildings before those campaigns can begin. The PropertyRadar alternatives guide examines that records-to-building gap across commercial and residential work.

Pick it if your office wants to operate ongoing property-record campaigns and has a dependable way to verify the physical fit.

4. Regrid for parcel mapping

Regrid Pro gives an individual researcher parcel tools for $10 monthly or $100 annually, making it a low-cost starting point for manual work.

Its official plan documentation includes map filtering, spreadsheet imports and exports, and notes or photos attached to properties. Pro includes 5,000 spreadsheet rows per month; Team costs $20 per user monthly. Three Team users would therefore cost $60 monthly before other purchases.

For an owner who wants to inspect a few parcels personally, the small access bill is appealing. I would consider it when a rep already knows which properties to approach and mainly needs a map to organize research.

Decide who does the selection. With a parcel tool, assign someone to review the roof or equipment and document the decision, including how to handle a parcel with several buildings, before treating the output as equivalent to a matched-building order.

Keep the property and the sales account separate in your file: one ownership record might cover several service locations, while a single location might have several structures with different roof systems requiring different scopes. Each assignment needs its own reason. Otherwise, the rep spends the first visit sorting out the account.

At the other end, a rep who only has twelve known properties to check should not buy a large list to avoid a small research task. The labor threshold in the money section shows where the recommendation changes.

Pick it if parcel mapping is the main requirement and your team has time to make and record the physical-fit decisions.

5. ATTOM for property data feeds

An internal data team can license Basic Property API access from $500 monthly, while ATTOM prices Premium access by quote.

The API pricing page lists assessment and property information, ownership and mortgage records, and basic sales history in the Basic offering. ATTOM also documents bulk-file and cloud delivery for teams that work with data in their own systems.

Someone must own the data work. For a distributor with an internal data team, connecting the feed and maintaining the process that produces a rep’s list may belong in a larger territory-planning system used by several departments. A service owner buying one campaign has another project to manage.

I would require a written output specification before discussing a feed. Define one row per service location, the physical selection criteria, and the contact fields your reps need. Ask what arrives populated and what your staff must derive or research. A larger file does not answer those questions by itself.

Price implementation separately from access. The employee who fixes missing addresses or changes a matching rule is part of the acquisition budget even when already drawing a salary, so allocate those hours to the departments that use the output. If the work exists only to produce 300 prospects, charge it to this campaign.

Pick it if your company has people responsible for operating a property database and will reuse the data beyond one sales list.

6. LightBox Vision for site research

LightBox Vision, formerly LandVision, is a map-based property research product for commercial real estate professionals, with pricing obtained through a sales inquiry.

The current LightBox Vision page describes ownership and portfolio research, zoning overlays and parcel information. It also documents building footprints and tools for filtering and exporting prospects. Use the current name when requesting a quote; an older LandVision price is not a current offer.

Price the site decision being made. A company comparing development locations has a different research burden from a dock service crew selecting warehouses for maintenance outreach, where the required output is a serviceable feature at a known location and the buying contact.

I would ask LightBox to show the requested building criteria in an export before budgeting the subscription. A building footprint helps locate the structure. Your campaign still needs its own acceptance rule for the roof, equipment or yard being serviced. Have the sales team identify the fields that satisfy that rule and the steps your office would perform afterward.

Keep the quote specific to Vision. Because the company sells multiple data products and delivery methods, a quote for one offering should not stand in for another’s scope, including the territory and the number of people who need access.

Pick it if your team repeatedly compares parcels and sites and needs map-based research as part of that work.

7. Crexi Intelligence for investment prospecting

Crexi Intelligence targets commercial real estate research, and its current plan table places property-data exports in the quote-based Standard tier.

The official product comparison lists Select at 299 dollars monthly or $269 per month billed yearly with a twelve-month commitment: $269 x 12 = $3,228 annually. Standard and Enterprise require a sales conversation. Select offers property and transaction research with owner contact credits purchased as needed; Standard adds property-data export among its features.

Check the export entitlement first. A rep’s ability to examine a record on screen does not establish that the chosen subscription includes the file your sales manager intends to distribute, so price the tier that delivers the required output. Include contact credits and user access.

For a roofing or HVAC team, I would then test physical selection separately from ownership research. Ask the vendor to run the requested roof or equipment criteria across your territory and provide sample results. If a person has to inspect each candidate afterward, include that person’s hours in the comparison.

Investment signals can help a rep decide which ownership change to investigate, but the crew still needs a reason to approach that particular roof or rooftop unit before the salesperson schedules an assessment. Give each field a job. Buy the features your process uses.

Pick it if property investment research is recurring work and the quoted tier includes the exports and contacts your process requires.

What does the same 300-building campaign cost?

Ground Control costs $3,000 to $6,000 for 300 commercial buildings; subscription alternatives need a second line for the labor required to produce matching targets.

For this worked budget, say a three-rep Fort Worth roofing team wants 300 buildings of at least 50,000 square feet with older membrane roofs. Use these planning assumptions, with research time measured across the team:

• Ground Control costs $15 per building, within its published range, plus six office hours to review and assign the delivered file.
• A records workflow produces one fitting building for every four candidates reviewed, with ten minutes spent checking each candidate and recording the decision.
• Office and outreach labor costs $45 per hour, including payroll burden. The existing CRM has no incremental campaign charge.
• Data access is purchased for one researcher where a monthly option is offered. Assume the candidate records can be exported in one billing month and screened without further subscription access; confirm permitted use before purchasing. Workflows requiring ongoing access add billing months. Quotes cover any required minimum term. No paid contact enrichment is purchased; contact research is included in the outreach budget below.

The exact Ground Control order price appears before payment on the pricing and order pages.

The cost before outreach

The records workflow requires 300 / 25% = 1,200 candidates. At ten minutes each, that is 1,200 x 10 / 60 = 200 research hours, costing 200 x $45 = $9,000. Ground Control’s review allowance is 6 x $45 = $270.

Route to 300 fitting buildings	Data purchase used in the budget	Modeled screening and assignment	Total before outreach
Ground Control	300 x $15 = $4,500	$270	$4,770
Reonomy monthly	From $500, plus export-pack quote	$9,000	From $9,500, plus export pack
CoStar	Quoted commitment	$9,000	Quote + $9,000
PropertyRadar Solo	$119 for one month	$9,000	$9,119
Regrid Pro	$10 for one month	$9,000	$9,010
ATTOM Basic Property API	From $500 monthly, subject to the licensed scope	$9,000	From $9,500, plus implementation and any longer commitment
LightBox Vision	Quoted commitment	$9,000	Quote + $9,000
Crexi Intelligence Standard	Quote for the tier listing property-data exports	$9,000	Quote + $9,000

The $9,000 labor line applies only when the sample produces the stated screening workload. Replace it with your timed result for each source. Included ownership and contact records deserve credit when they reduce the work your staff must do.

At the base inputs, Ground Control saves $9,010 minus $4,770 = $4,240 against the lowest access-cost route shown and releases 200 minus 6 = 194 research hours. At $20 per building, its cost becomes $6,000 + $270 = $6,270, still $2,740 below that route.

When manual screening costs less

Change the workload before changing the conclusion. With the $15 Ground Control input and Regrid’s $10 monthly access, the break-even manual research allowance is ($4,770 minus $10) / $45 = about 106 hours.

Screening workload	Candidate fit rate	Minutes per candidate	Manual research hours	Access plus research using $10 access
Low	50%	6	60	$2,710
Base	25%	10	200	$9,010
High	15%	14	About 467	$21,010

The high row uses 2,000 candidates and 28,000 research minutes, with hours rounded only for display. In the low row, manual work costs less than the $4,770 matched-list workflow, and I would choose it if the office has that capacity and the sample supports the faster screening time.

For 1,200 candidates, the base break-even allowance is roughly 5.3 minutes each. That is a decision rule you can test this week.

Cost per signed roofing account

Add 90 outreach hours at $45, including contact research, and 32 hours of surveys and estimating at $55. Allow another $420 for campaign travel and materials. Total acquisition spending becomes $4,770 + $4,050 + $1,760 + $420 = $11,000.

Budget a funnel of 300 buildings, 60 conversations, 18 surveys, nine proposals and two signed accounts. Those stage rates are 20%, 30%, 50% and about 22%, respectively. Two wins are 0.67% of the starting list. Customer acquisition cost, or CAC, is $11,000 / 2 = $5,500 per account.

For each project account, budget one $387,500 re-roof with $279,000 in direct job costs. That leaves $108,500 gross profit, a 28% margin. Add five expected collected years of maintenance at $6,800 annual revenue and 42% gross margin: 5 x $6,800 x 42% = $14,280. Assume those five years are collected in full, with no price increases or additional projects. Undiscounted account lifetime gross profit is $108,500 + $14,280 = $122,780, before company overhead and taxes. The low case buys maintenance only; the base and high cases each buy one re-roof plus maintenance per signed account.

Outcome	Account-life gross profit	Gross profit divided by $11,000 campaign cost	Lead-list ROI after campaign cost
Low: one maintenance account, no re-roof	$14,280	1.3x	30%
Base: two project accounts with maintenance	$245,560	22.3x	2,132%
High: three project accounts with maintenance	$368,340	33.5x	3,249%

Lead-list ROI is account-life gross profit minus acquisition spending, divided by acquisition spending. For the base case, ($245,560 minus $11,000) / $11,000 x 100 = 2,132% rounded to the nearest whole percent; return multiples are rounded to one decimal place. The large return comes from the value of a substantial roof project, with only two of 300 buildings becoming project accounts. Use your estimated job costs and expected maintenance years in the lead-list ROI calculator and the commercial roofing account-value guide.

The staffing comparison matters too. Six review hours plus 122 outreach and estimating hours make a 128-hour campaign. Manual screening makes it 322 hours. The same 322-hour team budget can support 322 / 128 = about 2.5 matched-list campaigns, each with its own list purchase and acquisition budget. Hold the stage rates constant and assume enough additional fitting buildings are available: 2 x 322 / 128 gives capacity for about five signed accounts instead of two.

Reonomy’s owner records and Ground Control’s building filters

Start with the building’s physical fit, then establish who controls the service decision; Ground Control offers owner information and decision-maker research as separate add-ons.

Reonomy’s documented ownership work reaches beyond the name recorded on a deed. That can support account research. Ground Control starts the campaign with the roof or equipment criteria and can add research into the person to contact. The two tasks can sit together in the same sales process.

I would write the reason for approaching each building before buying a person’s contact details. Then ask a question that establishes responsibility for the relevant work.

Ground Control starting criterion	First offer to develop	Buying-role question
Older membrane roof in your building-size band	Roof survey and maintenance scope	Who approves roof maintenance, and who handles replacement budgets?
Five or more visible rooftop units	PM agreement review	Who manages HVAC service for this location?
Paved parking area on selected property types	Crack fill, sealcoat or restriping assessment	Who schedules lot maintenance and approves the scope?
Visible storage tanks or loading docks	An assessment for the service your crew performs	Who owns the service responsibility for this equipment?

Keep the building address attached. Before discussing other properties, ask the recipient to confirm responsibility for the location you are calling about, then record the answer and the next step agreed for that building in the account notes.

For an HVAC visit, gather equipment details from the unit records and the authorized survey; for paving, measure the area being priced so the estimator has quantities tied to the scope being offered. The list gets the visit started. The field scope supplies the quantities.

Use the commercial owner research guide to assign the contact work and the property-manager outreach guide to prepare the approach, keeping ownership information separate from the person responsible for the service decision at that location.

For public buildings, Bid Control by PorchRocket finds work for your trade and area, with bid papers and addenda together. Bid Team can handle the forms and work the estimate with you. You make the final call on your number. You sign and send.

When another tool is the better buy

Choose a research platform over a matched-building order when the recurring task is transaction analysis, parcel investigation or operating your own data system.

• A brokerage studying lease activity and comparable transactions should assess CoStar against its daily research workload.
• An office running campaigns around property records can choose PropertyRadar if its existing screening process is fast enough.
• A researcher checking a small number of known parcels can start with Regrid and do the physical review personally.
• An internal data team building a repeatable territory system should price ATTOM’s delivery options or LightBox’s site-research workflow against that larger scope.

For a trade company ordering its next 300 fitting buildings, I would start with Ground Control and compare the sample against the time the office would otherwise spend.

How to switch from Reonomy in one week

Use the first seven days to define one territory, test 50 buildings and establish a measured workflow before expanding the campaign.

1. Day one: write the acceptance rule. Choose one offer and the buildings it fits. For the roofing example, specify the roof age band and membrane category, the 50,000-plus-square-foot building band, and the area your crew can service. List any excluded business types. Give the rule to the person reviewing the file.
2. Day one: preserve your working account history. Review renewal dates and permitted exports under the existing subscription. Save the records you are entitled to retain, with rep assignments and follow-up notes. Mark existing customers and active opportunities so the incoming file can be checked for duplicates.
3. Day two: order the Ground Control list. Select the territory, business types and physical criteria in Ground Control at $10 to $20 per commercial building. Review the exact price and choose any owner or decision-maker add-ons before paying. The file arrives within 48 hours after payment.
4. Day four: test 50 buildings. Pull the sample across the area instead of selecting only the easiest properties. Compare each row’s reason for matching with the written rule. Track accepted properties, wrong matches and unresolved questions separately. Record review minutes; report wrong matches within the 30-day credit window.
5. Day four: resolve the buying role. Use the ordered contact research or assign your own. Keep the named person attached to the building and ask who handles your service category. A returned call that identifies the correct manager is progress even before a survey is booked.
6. Day five: load and assign the sample. Import the file into your CRM, map the building and contact fields, and check duplicates. Assign each building to one rep. Keep the matching reason visible beside the next action so the salesperson can prepare without repeating the office research.
7. Days five through seven: work a consistent offer. Give the sample the same defined service offer and record attempts, conversations and surveys booked. Ask for a roof survey or an HVAC service review suited to the account. Avoid changing the offer halfway through the sample, or the results will be harder to compare.
8. Day seven: set the next decision date. Compare cost per accepted building and per conversation with the current method. Expand only the criteria that hold up. Keep tracking proposals and signed gross profit over the following 30 to 90 days; the first week establishes the list and workflow, while the sales results determine the next order.

For the review sheet, use one row per building and columns for acceptance, rejection reason, research minutes, buying role, outreach outcome and next date. Keep vendor match quality separate from whether an owner wants a meeting, so a quiet phone day is not recorded as a property-data error and a wrong roof is not recorded as a sales rejection.

Building a 300-property territory with Ground Control

The fastest way to replace manual property screening is to order a matched territory list from Ground Control by PorchRocket. Select business type and building size, then roof age band, material, rooftop HVAC, paved parking areas, storage tanks or loading docks. Commercial buildings cost $10 to $20 each, with the file delivered within 48 hours after payment. Every property says why it matched, and wrong matches reported within 30 days are credited back. These are target accounts your team approaches; the owners have not requested quotes.

A Ground Control order gives the sales manager a defined handoff:

• A territory selected around the area the crew serves, with the business types specified for the campaign.
• Buildings selected against the requested roof or equipment criteria, so each rep begins with the physical fit.
• A matching reason for every property, ready to carry into account notes and the first approach.
• Optional owner information and named decision-maker research, priced separately, with no charge for contacts not found.
• CSV and Excel files, plus the available import layouts and field-mapping help for the team’s existing tools.
• A delivery deadline and a credit process for wrong matches, so the office can schedule its review.

Give every rep a territory worth working with Ground Control.